|
TARKSOL GREEN
|
|
|
Tarksol
Biosoy 60 BEES
EPA Evaluation Results BEES measures the environmental performance of building products by using the life-cycle assessment approach specified in the ISO 14040 series of standards. All stages in the life of a product are analyzed: raw material acquisition, manufacture, transportation, installation, use, and recycling and waste management. Economic performance is measured using the ASTM standard life-cycle cost method, which covers the costs of initial investment, replacement, operation, maintenance and repair, and disposal. Environmental and economic performance are combined into an overall performance measure using the ASTM standard for Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis. For the entire BEES analysis, building products are defined and classified according to the ASTM standard classification for building elements known as UNIFORMAT II. BEES has been supported in part by the U.S. EPA Environmentally Preferable Purchasing (EPP) Program. The EPP program is charged with carrying out Executive Order 13101, "Greening the Government Through Waste Prevention, Recycling, and Federal Acquisition," which encourages Executive agencies to reduce the environmental burdens associated with the more than $230 billion in products and services they buy each year, including building products. BEES is being further developed as a tool to assist the Federal procurement community in carrying out affirmative procurement programs. BEES Scores Understanding BEES Scores
Here are the impacts that make up the BEES Environmental and Economic
Performance Scores. Click on any impact or score for more information
on
its meaning and use in the Federal Biobased Products Preferred
Procurement
Program (FB4P) context.
Computing BEES Environmental and Economic Performance Scores
BEES results are provided to empower the procuring official to consider
environmental and economic performance in identifying the product that
best meets the Federal agency’s needs. By scoring products across a
comprehensive range of environmental and economic impacts, BEES
facilitates purchasing that takes into account the trade-offs often
necessary to achieve a genuine reduction in these impacts, rather than
a
simple shift of impact. For example, “green” purchasing based on
minimizing the global warming impact alone does not account for the
fact
that global warming may have been reduced at the expense of other
impacts.
And a short-lived, low first-cost product is often not the most
cost-effective alternative. A higher first cost may be justified many
times over for a durable, maintenance-free product.
While the degree to which life-cycle environmental and economic
performance are incorporated into the procurement system is left up to
each agency, FB4P reports BEES performance results for the types of
biobased products that would fall within each designated item grouping.
Agencies are encouraged to request BEES results from manufacturers of
fossil fuel-based products to facilitate direct comparison of
life-cycle
performance within a designated item. BEES results for fossil
fuel-based
products can be obtained by manufacturers through the NIST BEES Please program.
While procurement officials are encouraged to consider life cycle costs
and environmental impacts when appropriate in the context of a specific
procurement, the FB4P program is not in a position to establish
specific
qualifying standards—such as maximum allowable BEES scores—for all
possible products for all procurements. Moreover, by reporting results
for
all impacts contributing to the BEES performance scores, FB4P provides
agencies the flexibility to place more or less importance on
contributing
impacts than assigned by BEES. For more on the importance BEES places
on
contributing impacts, see pages 25-31 of the BEES Technical Manual. Environmental Performance Score
The BEES Environmental Performance Score combines product performance
across all 12 environmental impacts into a single score. The lower the
score, the better is the product’s overall environmental performance.
The BEES Environmental Performance Score indicates the share of annual
per
capita
0.0130, for example, means the production and consumption of a unit of
the
product is estimated to represent 0.0130 percent of average annual per capita contributions to environmental impacts.
Global Warming is due to emissions generated by humankind that keep the
earth’s surface warmer than it would be otherwise. The BEES Global
Warming
Score indicates the degree to which production and consumption of the
biobased product contributes to this environmental impact.
Acidification damages trees, soil, buildings, animals, and humans.
Commonly referred to as “acid rain,” its principal human source is
fossil
fuel and biomass combustion. The BEES Acidification Score indicates the
degree to which production and consumption of the biobased product
contributes to this environmental impact.
Eutrophication is the addition of mineral nutrients to the soil or
water,
which in large quantities results in generally undesirable shifts in
the
number of species in ecosystems and a reduction in ecological
diversity.
The BEES Eutrophication Score indicates the degree to which production
and
consumption of the biobased product contributes to this environmental impact.
Fossil Fuel Depletion occurs when these resources are consumed at rates
faster than nature renews them. The BEES Fossil Fuel Depletion Score
indicates the degree to which production and consumption of the
biobased
product contributes to this environmental impact.
Indoor Air Quality suffers when products release pollutants indoors
during
their use. The BEES Indoor Air Quality Score indicates the degree to
which
production and consumption of the biobased product contributes to this environmental impact.
Habitat Alteration measures the potential for land use by humans to
lead
to undesirable changes in habitats. The BEES Habitat Alteration Score
indicates the degree to which production and consumption of the
biobased
product contributes to this environmental impact.
Water Intake can be problematic in areas where water is scarce, such as
the
degree to which production and consumption of the biobased product contributes to this environmental impact.
Criteria Air Pollutants arise from many activities including
combustion,
vehicle operation, power generation, materials handling, and crushing
and
grinding operations. They include coarse particles known to aggravate
respiratory conditions such as asthma, and fine particles that can lead
to
more serious respiratory symptoms and disease. The BEES Criteria Air
Pollutants Score indicates the degree to which production and
consumption
of the biobased product contributes to this environmental impact.
Human Health effects can arise from exposure to industrial and natural
substances, and range from transient irritation to permanent disability
and even death. The BEES Human Health Score indicates the degree to
which
production and consumption of the biobased product contributes to this environmental impact.
FB4P requires reporting of the details underlying the BEES Human Health
Scores, so a Human Health by Sorted Flows report is included with the
BEES results. In assessing human health, BEES tracks more than 200
flows
to air “(a)” and water “(w)” associated with cancer and other
human
health issues. The five flows with the largest contributions to the
BEES
Human Health Score are displayed in the report, with all others
combined
and reported as “All Other Flows.” These values are reported in
grams of
toluene per unit of product. Most result from electricity production
that occurs outside the gates of the biobased product manufacturing
facility. While the values may look large, the average
responsible for over 158 million grams of toluene-equivalent releases
per year. So when you put the BEES Human Health Scores into context
(like they are in the Environmental Performance report), they're not as
large as they may first appear.
Smog forms under certain climatic conditions when air emissions from
industry and transportation are trapped at ground level where they
react
with sunlight. Smog leads to harmful impacts on human health and
vegetation. The BEES Smog Score indicates the degree to which
production
and consumption of the biobased product contributes to this
environmental impact.
Ozone Depletion, or a thinning of the stratospheric ozone layer, allows
more harmful short wave radiation to reach the Earth’s surface,
potentially causing undesirable changes in ecosystems, agricultural
productivity, skin cancer rates, and eye cataracts, among other issues.
The BEES Ozone Depletion Score indicates the degree to which production
and consumption of the biobased product contributes to this
environmental impact.
Ecological Toxicity measures the potential of pollutants from
industrial
sources to harm land- and water-based ecosystems. The BEES Ecological
Toxicity Score indicates the degree to which production and consumption
of
the biobased product contributes to this environmental impact.
Economic Performance Score
BEES scores economic performance on the basis of a product’s
life-cycle
cost. The lower the life-cycle cost, the better is the product’s
overall economic performance.
The life-cycle cost includes all costs associated with a product over a
fixed period of time. These costs are particularly relevant for durable
products such as building materials for which competing alternative
products may have significantly different useful lives, maintenance and
repair schedules, operating energy usage, and installation
requirements.
Life-cycle costing accounts for these important differences by
evaluating
product alternatives over the same study period.
First Costs includes costs for product purchase and, if applicable,
installation.
Future Costs include costs for operation, maintenance, repair, and
replacement. For consumables and other products for which no
significant
or quantifiable durability differences are found among competing
alternatives, future costs are not calculated.
For a more technical, detailed description of the BEES product scoring
system, go to the BEES Technical Manual.
Office of Applied Economics
Please send technical questions about BEES to barbara.lippiatt@nist.gov
Last modified: Results on Tarksol Biosoy 60
* *No
significant/quantifiable durability differences were identified among
competing alternatives. Therefore, future costs were not calculated.
*
|
Send mail to webmaster@tarksol.com with
questions or comments about this web site.
|